Cittadelle Built on Truth. Driven by Freedom.

Some truths are
worth fortifying.

A closed platform where sources are verified collectively, documents are analysed in depth, and knowledge is built together — not consumed.

What is Cittadelle? Sign in or join with your invite code
Visit the Cittadelle → | How it works →
How it works
01
Sources
Members submit documents. Three argued notes, each bringing its own distinct evidence, make one verified. An official URL or a DOI takes a shorter path: three members confirm the reference.
02
Chambers
Persistent communities where the work happens, split into strands of enquiry. Moderators keep them tidy; nobody adjudicates what is true.
03
Proposals
You propose a connection with your reasoning and your sources. Three members endorse it, each with their own. Then it migrates into the shared map — permanently, and traceable back to the case that put it there.
04
Graphs
Three permanent maps of the same world, built entirely from migrated proposals. Every node and connection carries its evidence.
05
Briefs
Where a line of enquiry ends: a short documented argument, at least two authors, citing its sources by code. Briefs are not contested — answer a reading with a reading.
There is more to it than that
The Manifesto says why this exists and what it refuses to be. The Method explains the mechanics — how each kind of source is established, how a disagreement is settled, when a connection counts as direct rather than structural.
Read the Manifesto → The Method →
Three maps of the same world
Octopus
Who is connected to whom
People, organisations, events and places, and the relationships between them. It grows outward from whatever is most connected — which is usually where the interesting part is.
Follow the Money
Who gave what to whom
Directional and layered: money enters on the left and works its way right. The thickness of an arrow is the size of the amount, so a large transfer reads before you have identified anything on the page.
Pyramid
Who owns what, and how much
Ownership descends: ultimate owners at the top, operating companies at the bottom, percentages on every link. The effective stake through the whole chain is computed, not stated.
And one map of your own
Traces
What moved while you were away

Trace a source, a contestation, a proposal, a Brief, an entity, a strand or a post. From then on Traces keeps watch for you: what has changed around each of them since your last visit — a verification, a contestation opened or closed, a new citation, a mention in someone else’s argument — and how the things you follow point to one another.

Since you were last here
What moved while you were away comes first, the last thirty days underneath. A gold dot beside ∴ Traces in the sidebar says something is waiting.
Worth tracing
A source cited by two of your traces, the strand three of them share: what you do not follow yet but probably should, each with the reason it is suggested.
Path
All of it drawn as one map: your traces, the links between them, strands as zones, and what has changed marked in gold. It stays the way you arrange it.
Seen by no one
What you follow reveals what you are investigating, so no one else can see it. A page shows how many people trace something — never who.
How Traces works, in detail →
…as the Chilean cables show — SRC-0034 ✓ Verified · 3 notes

Everything here has a code. Write it anywhere and it becomes a live citation carrying the document's verification status with it. You cannot quote a source without also quoting how well the community has established that it says what you claim it says.

Verified, not upvoted
Three argued notes, each bringing its own distinct evidence. You cannot vote a document into being authentic.
No arbiter of truth
No moderator decides whether a source is genuine. Disagreement is a formal procedure, in public, with every participant on the record.
Invite-only
No public registration. You join because a member vouched for you — and who invited whom is recorded.